Work

Product & Go-to-Market consulting

High-trust product and GTM support for healthcare and regulated teams—so you build the right thing, for the right user, with the right story.

Start a conversation

Share your context and goals to get a recommended next step.

Featured outcomes

Proof points to start with

Scan the results first, then dig into the artifacts and log entries that back them up.

Decision clarity

Fewer “maybe” decisions, more crisp tradeoffs

Create a decision trail that aligns stakeholders and makes risk explicit before a roadmap locks in.

Jump to proof →

Adoption outcomes

A tighter MVP that users actually adopt

Scope the smallest viable path that proves value in clinical workflows, not just demos.

Jump to proof →

Message clarity

Messaging that lands in 10 seconds

Make buyers understand what you do, for whom, and why now—without a long deck.

Jump to proof →

Fit & focus

Fit

Who this is for

Build the right thing, for the right user, with the right story—especially when the cost of a wrong bet is measured in quarters.

Who this is for

  • Seed to Series B founders building in healthcare, fintech-for-pros, or other trust-heavy markets.
  • Teams with strong execution that need senior judgment and prioritization.
  • Companies where credibility and workflow fit matter as much as features.
  • Leaders navigating buyer vs. user tension in regulated sales cycles.
  • Founders preparing for funding, pivots, or GTM resets.
Regulated system signals
  • Clinical workflow research across clinicians, patients, and administrators.
  • Healthcare buyer enablement and stakeholder mapping.
  • Regulated market MVP definition and scope control.
  • Pricing and packaging inputs for trust-heavy products.
When this isn’t for you
  • Teams looking for a full-time operator or embedded PM hire.
  • Situations where decisions must stay vague or political.
  • Long retainers without clear decision points.
  • Business models that rely on ambiguous claims or dark patterns.

Practice model

How I partner with teams

A focused engagement model that turns product and GTM ambiguity into a plan with clear owners and next steps.

  • ModalitiesAdvisory calls, focused product/GTM sprints, and fractional leadership.
  • MarketsHealthcare, fintech-for-pros, and other trust-heavy domains.
  • OutcomesCrisp MVPs, clear positioning, and decisions that stick.

Decision prompts

Product strategy

Turn ambiguity into an executable plan

Clarify the real problem, the riskiest assumptions, and the smallest viable scope.

  • Problem selection, prioritization, and MVP definition.
  • User research synthesis across clinicians, patients, and admins.

Healthcare GTM

Make your product legible, credible, and buyable

Positioning, messaging, and distribution for trust-heavy markets.

  • Buyer vs. user clarity and the wedge into clinical orgs.
  • Pricing and packaging inputs grounded in buyer reality.

Fractional leadership

Senior product judgment without a full-time hire

Operating cadence, hiring support, and cross-team alignment.

  • Product team structure, PRD review, and metrics rituals.
  • Executive-level tradeoffs and narrative building.

Engagements

What you get

Engagement packages

Clear outputs, bounded timelines, and written decision recaps.

We start with the decision you’re stuck on, then scope the smallest engagement that resolves it.

Value framing

Every package pairs product clarity with GTM positioning so teams can move with confidence.

Which engagement fits?

  • Need fast clarity? Start with an advisory call.
  • Need a clear plan? Choose the product/GTM sprint.
  • Need senior judgment over time? Go fractional.

Advisory calls (fast clarity)

Sharp feedback and next steps when you need decisive product or GTM clarity.

Duration: 60–90 minutes Pricing: Hourly.
See details →

Outputs

  • Ideal for: pivots, roadmap conflicts, GTM confusion, investor prep.
  • Format: 60–90 minutes, pre-read encouraged.
  • Output: written recap with decisions + recommended next actions.

What success looks like early

  • Before: short context intake and shared documents.
  • During: live decision framing with tradeoffs surfaced.
  • After: recap delivered within 48 hours.

Success (30/60/90)

  • 1 week: a clear decision and next action list.
  • 30 days: reduced churn from unresolved internal debate.
  • 90 days: decision implemented or cleanly parked.

Product/GTM sprint

Focused engagement to answer one hard question and ship a plan.

Duration: 1–3 weeks Pricing: Fixed fee.
See details →

Outputs

  • Clear target user + JTBD.
  • MVP scope and sequencing.
  • Messaging draft + proof points.
  • Experiments and success metrics.

What success looks like early

  • Week 1: discovery + decision framing.
  • Week 2: synthesis, scope, and messaging draft.
  • Week 3: roadmap + experiment plan shipped.

Success (30/60/90)

  • 30 days: MVP scope locked and validated.
  • 60 days: early adoption or pilot proof.
  • 90 days: GTM messaging tested with buyer feedback.

Fractional head of product

Senior product judgment and operating cadence without a full-time hire.

Duration: Monthly Pricing: Monthly retainer.
See details →

Outputs

  • Standing weekly sync + async review.
  • Support on hiring, roadmap, discovery, and stakeholder alignment.
  • Executive-level tradeoff decisions and narrative building.

What success looks like early

  • Week 1: onboarding and roadmap audit.
  • Week 2: cadence and documentation rituals established.
  • Week 3+: ongoing decision support and GTM alignment.

Success (30/60/90)

  • 30 days: clearer roadmap and metrics.
  • 60 days: fewer stalled decisions across teams.
  • 90 days: consistent delivery cadence with executive alignment.

Engagement details

  • Engagement & pricing: Advisory sessions (hourly), fixed-fee sprints, and monthly fractional support.
  • Engagement sizing: If you share context and goals, I recommend the smallest engagement that gets a decision.
  • Availability: Limited openings each quarter to keep the work hands-on.
  • Async rhythm: Async-first documentation with 24–48 hour response windows.
  • Engagement boundaries: Clear decision points, crisp scope, and written recaps after key milestones.
  • Contact: Contact: [Add email] · LinkedIn: [Add link] · Calendly: [Add link]

Case studies

Proof depth

Case study arcs (redacted)

Problem → constraints → intervention → what shipped → measured change. Metrics are rounded and de-identified; range details are shared in intake for qualified teams.

Outcomes in one line

  • Improved telehealth reachability with verified caller ID and trust signals.
  • Reduced avoidable escalations after unifying records and redefining success.
  • Faster high-risk review cycles with clearer ownership and auditability.

How I protect your team: I don’t name sensitive internal politics, and I never publish identifying details without consent. Metrics stay rounded and de-identified, artifacts are redacted, and access is limited to the stakeholders you choose. Quantified deltas are shared in redacted form when available.

2015–2017

Doximity

Verified caller ID for HIPAA-conscious telehealth

Built trusted caller identity and guardrails so clinicians could reach patients without exposing private numbers.

  • Problem: patients ignored unknown numbers, stalling telehealth care.
  • Constraints: HIPAA privacy, carrier spoofing rules, and clinician adoption risk.
  • Intervention: verified caller ID, clear consent copy, and fallback workflows.
  • Shipped: Dialer trust indicators and audit-ready call logs.
  • Measured change: improved reachability and fewer spoofing concerns after launch.
Read case study →

2020–2022

Transcarent

Care navigation that cut avoidable escalations

Reframed success metrics around completed care plans to reduce rework and clinician load.

  • Problem: escalations surged because guidance was fragmented across teams.
  • Constraints: clinical governance, benefit partner rules, and variable patient acuity.
  • Intervention: unified member record and clinician-led routing rules.
  • Shipped: care plan completion dashboards and handoff rituals.
  • Measured change: fewer escalations and stronger completion after unifying records.
Read case study →

2022–2024

Andwise

Fiduciary-safe financial planning workflows

Balanced automated guidance with human oversight so recommendations stayed compliant and trusted.

  • Problem: clinicians needed financial guidance without opaque sales pressure.
  • Constraints: fiduciary duty, compliance review, and high-stakes decision anxiety.
  • Intervention: advisory board governance and human-reviewed routing for riskier plans.
  • Shipped: plain-language summaries and override logs tied to advisors.
  • Measured change: faster reviews and cleaner ownership for high-risk guidance.
Read case study →

Start a project

Ready to start

Start with a scoped decision

Share a short brief and I’ll recommend the smallest engagement that gets you to clarity.

Project intake Share a project brief A quick form that drafts the email for you. Open intake form →

Contact

Contact: [Add email]

LinkedIn: [Add link]

Calendly: [Add link]

Partner feedback

“Kanav made our escalation paths visible in a week. The clarity reduced on-call stress immediately.”

Head of Platform

Healthcare infrastructure

Series C healthtech

“The constraint map became our operating manual. We finally knew which decisions were binding.”

COO

Operations lead

Civic services org

A note on fit

Fit check

A note on fit

This is high-leverage strategic work, not executional delivery.

  • I don’t write code or run delivery teams.
  • I don’t run ads or lead paid acquisition.
  • I’m not a generic slide-deck consultant.
  • I avoid vague, open-ended retainers without decision points.

More context

More depth

Keep exploring the work

If you want more detail, these pages go deeper without adding extra scroll here.